12 Angry Men
What insight is Juror #5 able to offer because of his slum background?
Act 3
Act 3
The 5th Juror examines the switchblade. He explains that it would make no sense for someone to stab someone like that with a switchblade because it would require the attacker to lose precious time. Because the defendant was highly competent with a switchblade, it becomes questionable whether or not he would have made that chest wound.
http://www.gradesaver.com/12-angry-men/study-guide/summary-act-two