What was the reason of making Garner agood master? why should Morrison depicts him in the way he was?

Morrison uses Garner and his brother-in-law Schoolteacher to compare and contrast the difference in slaveowners and their treatment of slaves. Garner is shed in a more positive light than his brother-in-law because he was said to have been generous toward his slaves (later proven to be a sham). Schoolteacher was cruel and abusive from the get go...... he was evil.

But after all he was a SLAVE OWNER, what do you say about that? what do you say about slavery?

But after all he was a SLAVE OWNER, what do you say about that? what do you say about slavery?

But after all he was a SLAVE OWNER, what do you say about that? what do you say about slavery?

Sahar- The purpose here was to characterize the slaveowners. Garner was an example of what Morrison considered a "generous" owner. Schoolteacher was an abusive, tyranical owner. If you need to discuss slave ownership in your homework, those opinions need to come from YOU.