Romeo and Juliet

Are the three letters(Tybalt’s, Friar Lawrence’s, and Romeo’s) essential or nonessential to the tragedy? Why?

Tybalt sent a letter to Romeo, wanting to fight a duel with him, soon leading to both Mercutio and Tybalt’s death. The second letter by Friar Lawrence consisted of the plan for Romeo and Juliet to be together at last. However, the letter never got to Romeo, in which Balthasar found out about Juliet’s death and told Romeo about it. Lastly, in Romeo’s letter it had explained everything, from why he killed Tybalt to why he’s killed himself.

Asked by
Last updated by jill d #170087
Answers 1
Add Yours

In my opinion, they are not essential. Each of these letters contained information that could have been communicated in other ways, and communication at the time.... particularly, the exchange of letters was obviously not a guarantee. You can look at this in numerous different ways.... Mercutio's rash behavior, Friar Lawrence's assumptions, Juliet's impetuous nature, and Romeo's devastation all led to the same end. They were not essential because the characters themselves were each rash and impetuous in their own ways..... immature, unthinking. Friar Lawrence is the one character we would think level headed, but even he allows himself to unthinkingly be pulled in...... to act without true thought to the possibility of what could go wrong.