Hamilton used historical evidence to discuss why bills of rights had existed in the past. Did that evidence have anything to do with the case he was discussing? How did he use logic to make the case that a Bill of Rights was dangerous?

Question

The Federalist Papers

Hamilton used historical evidence to discuss why bills of rights had existed in the past. Did that evidence have anything to do with the case he was discussing? How did he use logic to make the case that a Bill of Rights was dangerous?

Read Federalist, No. 84,

Asked by Gurpreet M #913366 on 6/22/2019 4:13 AM

Last updated by Michael R #1137593 on 4/14/2021 6:34 PM

Answers 1

Add Yours

Answered by mdididi s #1111173 on 2/9/2021 6:36 AM

Hamilton used historical evidence to discuss why bills of rights had existed in the past. Did that evidence have anything to do with the case he was discussing? How did he use logic to make the case that a Bill of Rights was dangerous?

Source(s)

Federalist, No. 84,

Answers 1

Source(s)

Log In To Your GradeSaver Account

Create Your GradeSaver Account