In your opinion, does the state present sufficient evidence of Tom’s guilt?

This question calls for your opinion. In my opinion, the state lacked evidence. What do you think?

the state didnt lack evidence i think they have all the evidence they needed but the verdict still said he was guilty

I say that the state did lack evidence because they never showed any medical evidence, nor did the police (apart from Sheriff Heck Tate) did a full-scan observation of the crime scene-which was the Ewells' house.