Microeconomics: Principles, Applications, and Tools (8th Edition)

Published by Prentice Hall
ISBN 10: 0-13294-886-9
ISBN 13: 978-0-13294-886-9

Chapter 16 - External Costs and Environmental Policy - Exercises - 16.3 Traditional Regulation - Page 374: 3.8d

Answer

Paying compensation is worse for Janis than paying the tax.

Work Step by Step

Compensating dormmates per song External cost per song = \$4 Songs played if no tax = \$9 Total compensation required = 9 × 4 = \$36 Compare with tax: Tax per song = \$4 With tax, she plays 6 songs → total tax paid = 6 × 4 = \$24 Comparison from Janis’s perspective: Compensating dormmates costs \$36 and allows her to play 9 songs → CS calculation: WTP = 45 Compensation paid = 36 Net CS = 45 − 36 = 9 Paying tax: She plays 6 songs, CS = 15 Tax paid = 24 (we already included price in previous calculation?) Actually, in part (b), the CS already accounts for price/tax: CS = 15 Comparison: Paying tax → CS = 15 Compensating dormmates → CS = 9 Conclusion: Paying compensation is worse for Janis than paying the tax.
Update this answer!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.

Update this answer

After you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.