The Trial of an Ox for Killing a Man Irony

by

The Trial of an Ox for Killing a Man Irony

By · Edited by Patrick Kennedy · Last reviewed

Irony of the verdict

The animal court decides that the Ox has committed murder; however, it also decides that the cruelty of the human warrants his death. Therefore, the Ox is found guilty but also earns his freedom.

Irony of moral

Although this court trial is concerned with the murder of a human, the moral of the court is ultimately about animal abuse. As such, the court is held about abuse to humans, but ironically becomes about abuse to animals.

Irony of the cockerel

The character of the cockerel, who usually starts the day, ironically ends the court proceedings in this story: "Upon which the cock clapped his wings, and crowed applause to the verdict".

Update this section!

You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this section.

Update this section

After you claim a section you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.

Cite this page

Study Guide for The Trial of an Ox for Killing a Man

The Trial of an Ox for Killing a Man study guide contains literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.

Read the Study Guide for The Trial of an Ox for Killing a Man…

Essays for The Trial of an Ox for Killing a Man

The Trial of an Ox for Killing a Man essays are academic essays for citation. These papers were written primarily by students and provide critical analysis of The Trial of an Ox for Killing a Man.