Answer
Yes, based on the results of part (b), there is enough evidence that the employee is guilty of embezzlement.
Work Step by Step
In part (b), the null hypothesis was rejected using a low level of significance ($α=0.01$).
You can help us out by revising, improving and updating this answer.
Update this answerAfter you claim an answer you’ll have 24 hours to send in a draft. An editor will review the submission and either publish your submission or provide feedback.